Telling women to ‘lean in’ won’t get more of them in politics — the parties have left women behind

By Jennifer M. Piscopo via Toronto Star

Men dominate Canadian politics. In the 2021 federal election, men represented 57 per cent of candidates for the Liberal party, 67 per cent of Conservative candidates and 70 per cent of elected MPs.

Yet rarely do we hear about men’s political dominance. Instead, we hear about women’s absence. Women don’t run, the pundits say. Women lack confidencedoubt their qualifications and wait to be asked. Women must, as a 2019 House of Commons report concluded, be empowered to stand.

Enter the “lean in” narrative of women’s underrepresentation. To overcome women’s reluctance, dozens of programs and schools across Canada and the globe are training women to run for office.

Except “lean in” directs attention away from the real culprits — and it won’t bring about gender parity anytime soon.

The lean-in solution exists because research shows that women have less political ambition than men. Study after study from the U.S. found that women were consistently less likely than men to consider running for office. In Canada, one in three men had thought about running, versus one in five women.

Women’s lack of political ambition is a deceptively simple fact. On the one hand, this gender gap does exist. On the other hand, it blames women for their own underrepresentation, implying that it’s female character deficiencies in need of fixing.

Read More

Women in politics: To run or not to run?

By Semra Sevi via The Conversation

Despite progress towards gender equality, women’s representation in Canadian politics continues to fall short. With only 30 per cent of seats in the House of Commons held by women, there is still a long way to go for Parliament to capture the diversity of the population it represents.

There are several factors that contribute to the persistent gender disparities in the political process. Research on women in politics has identified multiple obstacles that hinder women’s representation, with three factors emerging as the most prominent explanations.

Read More

Time to let party leaders know gender balance in politics matters to Canadians

By Susan Franceshet and Jennifer Piscopo via The Globe and Mail

It’s official – the Alberta election is under way, and the race for who will lead the province promises to be a closely fought battle between two powerful women, former premier Rachel Notley and sitting Premier Danielle Smith.

Sadly, having two women contest a high-profile provincial election is an exception, not the norm. The country is still falling further behind when it comes to women in politics, particularly in federal elections.

Canada ranks a pitiful 61st globally for women in its national parliament, much lower than European countries and even lagging behind Australia, Britain and New Zealand. We ended up here because our leaders haven’t taken any meaningful action to include women at election time. It’s time to let party leaders know that gender balance in politics matters to Canadians.

Revisiting the suffragists’ playbook to demand parity in political representation might be a good idea.

Canadian women campaigned for the right to vote for more than three decades; activists began organizing in 1876 but didn’t win voting rights until 1918. Indigenous people would wait several more decades.

Hard work and creativity were key. Women established provincial and national suffragist organizations. They gathered signatures on petitions. They staged mock parliaments to demonstrate their political knowledge and debate skills. And they were opposed and scorned at every turn.

Now, it’s been more than 100 years since Agnes Macphail became the first woman to be elected to Parliament – yet men still hold 70 per cent of seats in the House of Commons.

This underrepresentation matters, because governments are much more likely to develop policies and prioritize spending on issues that affect women when women are actually sitting at the table.

Consider that feminist organizing and lobbying ensured that gender equality was enshrined in the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But having guarantees on paper was not enough.

Even with constitutional guarantees, women have had to keep the pressure on. They’ve staged multiple protest marches to gain full reproductive rights and to call public attention to the problem of violence against women, including missing and murdered Indigenous girls and women.

The lesson keeps repeating itself: Change doesn’t just happen. Those with political power don’t easily concede the needs or perspectives of those who are not represented. Change happens when advocates mobilize others to join campaigns that call public – and then politicians’ – attention to problems of injustice, insecurity and inequality.

Other countries can offer inspiration.

In 1975, the women of Iceland went on strike. Instead of going to work or tending to their families, they took to the streets, paralyzing the country. Within a year, the government adopted the Gender Equality Act. Iceland has ranked No. 1in the world on gender equality for more than a dozen years, and women constitute 47 per cent of MPs.

More recently, on International Women’s Day in 2018, five million Spanish women workers staged a “feminist strike.” They marched in protest of the gender wage gap and violence against women, chanting slogans such as, “if women stop, the world stops.”

Today, Spanish women hold 42 per cent of parliamentary seats and a majority of cabinet posts. A proposed Equal Representation Law will preserve these gains. Spain already has a 40 per cent quota for women candidates, and the new law would elevate this quota to 50 per cent for parliament, cabinet and corporate boards of directors.

Hard work and strategic alliances among women in Latin America also resulted in gender parity in politics. Both Mexico and Argentina require parties to divide candidacies equally among men and women. And in Chile, women chanting, “we are half, we want half,” in the streets and in Congress resulted in the world’s first constitutional convention where women held exactly 50 per cent of the seats.

When women come together – especially across political lines – they get heard. In the U.S., male legislators accepted meetings with female lobbyists only when they realized that the women had mobilized constituents. And collaboration among women’s organizations was key in getting so many African parliaments to adopt gender quotas.

Of course, women faced hurdles when seeking quotas and parity. After all, securing the right to equal representation means that some men will have to stand down to make way.

But these actions are evidence that when women unite, they can win rights to political parity. A concerted campaign using the suffragists’ tactics – letter-writing, marches and mock parliaments made up of women – would help to show that a status quo where men hold 70 per cent of seats in Parliament is completely unacceptable.

Canadian women have come together and fought for basic rights before. To speed up the glacial pace of their political advancement, they probably need to do so again.

Susan Franceschet is Professor of Political Science at the University of Calgary, @sufranceschet.

Jennifer M. Piscopo is Associate Professor of and Chair of Politics at Occidental College in Los Angeles, California, @Jennpiscopo.

This op-ed was originally published in the Globe and Mail

Canadians Want Action on Gender Parity in Politics

New research shows Canadians overwhelmingly support equal representation in politics, but give governments and political parties failing grades on progress so far.

Canadians have long seen gender equality as a defining value of our democracy. But recent polling conducted by Abacus Data for Informed Perspectives reveals a sharp disconnect between Canadians’ commitment to parity and the lack of progress in political representation.


Canadians Expect More
Nearly all Canadians want to see more being done to achieve gender parity in politics. Many are surprised, even disappointed, to learn that Canada ranks just 70th globally in women’s representation—a decline from 59th a few years ago. Four in ten Canadians say they are surprised by Canada’s low global standing, and nearly as many say they are disappointed that more progress hasn’t been made.

The data also show a broader frustration: 30% of Canadians describe Canadian society as inequitable – an opinion ten points higher among women than men.

A Core Canadian Value
Gender parity is not a fringe concern. It is a core belief for Canadians across political affiliations and demographics. Eighty-six percent say equal representation of men and women in politics is important at all levels of government, a finding consistent since 2022. Importantly, support cuts across lines of gender and party preference.


Canadians also believe that parity brings concrete benefits:

  • 84% say it leads to policies that better reflect the realities and needs of the broader population.
  • 81% say it increases respect in political dialogue.
  • 78% say it boosts government productivity.
  • 78% say it fosters more cross-partisan collaboration.

For most Canadians, parity is about building a democracy that works better for everyone.

Canadians want Institutional Involvement
Yet expectations remain clear: around seven in ten Canadians, and nearly eight in ten when it comes to the federal government, want each of these institutions and groups to play a big role in ensuring women have an equal voice in politics.


Pathways Forward
Canadians strongly support learning from international examples and adopting proven strategies here at home. Enforcing greater civility and respect in debates (73%) and changing conditions of work for elected officials (69%) top the list of reforms Canadians see as both effective and necessary.


Support is also growing for more ambitious measures. A majority now favour requiring parties to nominate a minimum number of women candidates (58%, up four points since last measured) and to run women in winnable ridings (56%, up four points). There is also majority support for legislatures, including the House of Commons, to ensure a minimum number of women are elected representatives.

Across the board, more than seven in ten Canadians believe these measures would help Canada achieve parity-including men and women, and supporters of all major federal parties.


Upshot
Canadians are clear: gender parity is fundamental to the health of our democracy. They believe it strengthens our economy, improves decision-making, and reflects the values of equality we aspire to as a country. But they are equally clear that governments and political parties are not doing enough.

With Canada sliding in international rankings, the choice is stark: act now with proven strategies to
ensure women are equal partners in shaping our future, or risk further erosion of Canada’s democratic credibility.

Methodology
The survey was conducted with 2,000 adult Canadians over the age of 18 from July 31 to August 5, 2025. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.

The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is +/- 2.19%, 19 times out of 20.

The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada’s population according to age, gender, educational attainment, and region. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

The Evidence is Clear: Women’s Equality is Critical

FACT: Women are more vulnerable than men to a tough economy, vitriolic political discourse and climate change.

Canada can achieve gender parity in politics: here’s how

How to advance equal representation for women in Parliament

Canada is a leader in supporting women’s equality around the world, but at home we are falling behind when it comes to electing women.

Why gender parity matters

Pipeline theory for gender parity debunked

The pipeline theory that gender parity in politics would occur once women caught up to men in education and experience in politics-adjacent fields like law and business is simply not true:

Systemic approaches have proven more effective

The number of women in legislative bodies only meaningfully increases when gender parity rules are adopted that apply to all political parties.

Most countries electing more than 40 per cent women use a statutory gender quota that applies to the number of women candidates parties run.

An analysis of the five democracies with national electoral systems most comparable to Canada’s (single-member districts with first-past-the-post rules) demonstrated that the criteria and enforcement mechanisms employed make a measurable difference to their impact. 

The research finds that approaches taken in Nepal, South Korea and Uzbekistan rely on weak requirements and have been largely ineffective; France has achieved mixed results. However, Mexico, where women now make up 50.2% of federal representatives, has a very effective statutory candidate gender quota with features that Canada could effectively adapt as outlined below.

Read Jennifer Piscopo’s full report here

Informed Perspectives is a registered charity working to bridge the gender gap in Canadian public discourse. Conversations happening in the news media and political spheres have the power to influence everything else, and the chronic under-representation of women’s voices hampers our ability to advance in every arena.

  • Monitor media representation and drive accountability through our Gender Gap Tracker
  • Elevate women’s voices through workshops that transform knowledge into influence
  • Connect 1,500 journalists with diverse qualified sources through our expert database
  • Commission research into equality measures that can inform systemic change solutions.